Trump classified documents trial in Florida postponed indefinitely
The trial on charges that Donald Trump willfully retained classified national security records after leaving the White House was scheduled to start May 20.
www.cnbc.combarbisblue — www.cnbc.com/2024/05/07/t...
Guilty or innocent (lol), a stunning disservice to the American people, who have a right to know -- and in a timely (at minimum customary) manner -- whether a candidate for POTUS is guilty of serious felonies. UNDER THE ESPIONAGE ACT, FFS.
A corrupt judge with a horrific origin story.
The sad thing is that nothing is being done about it.
Delayed due to procedural issues the judge herself introduced.
She's a slick one.
Similar Posts
The judge (Me), banging gavel: GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY! ONE BILLION YEARS PRISON FOR THE CRIME OF BEING A COMPUTER!
The real beneficiaries of a trial before November would be the voters, who deserve to know whether a candidate for the nation’s highest office has been found innocent or guilty by a jury.”
"The real beneficiaries of a trial before November would be the voters, who deserve to know whether a candidate for the nation’s highest office has been found innocent or guilty by a jury."
This is a marker in the Judge Dredd strip.
To him, the law is the law is the law. He doesn't care if you're the gunman on the street, the mutant killing innocent people, or a millionaire buying black market organs. If you're guilty, you're guilty.
9/END
London, Ont. attacker Nathaniel Veltman guilty of all charges; whether or not it’s a terrorist act is now in the hands of the judge, Justice Renee Pomerance.
London, Ont. attacker Nathaniel Veltman guilty of all charges; judge to decide if killer is a terror...
A Windsor, Ont. jury has returned five guilty verdicts to Nathaniel Veltman for the June 2021 attack on a Muslim family. Whether or not its terrorism is now in the hands of the judge, Justice Renee Po...
london.ctvnews.ca
The thing that feels extra crazy to me is that there is a playbook for this - they just have to follow it! Trump is hardly the first defendant to threaten a judge. I once knew a fed judge (bougie, I know) who had it happen - another judge jailed the defendant and the trial rolled forward.
Nothing is Unconstitutional until a Judge says it is. Horrible things can happen between a Law passing and a Judge telling them to stuff it.
In a lot of cases, the Fear is the point. The people passing the law know it's going to get struck down.
Interesting story from a courtroom.
(Kise is Trump's attorney who is clearly offending the judge in Trump's trial, which makes people speculate he wants a mistrial due to a biased judge.)
People are suggesting that maybe Kise is deliberately antagonizing the judge to get him to do unwise things. It’s possible.
And that reminds me of a story I haven’t heard in a long time.
The year is 1997 and I’m a young federal prosecutor.
/1
@kenwhite.bsky.social What are the double-jeopardy rules for DOJ appealing a not-guilty judgement as a matter of law that is entered after the plaintiffs case in chief has concluded?
I know a jury verdict of not-guilty is generally not appealable. What about a judge entering a not-guilty verdict?
Ugh, what even is this sentence
(from Judge Cannon's denial without prejudice of Trump's motion to dismiss counts for unconstitutional vagueness) storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
“I have the right to write about whatever I want. The only thing a reader can judge is whether I’ve done so well or not.” - Hanya Yanagihara
Uganda's Soft Ground #Wrestling is the closest thing we have to a modern day ECW — and I'm being totally serious.
mondoinvasorx.wordpress.com/2024/05/07/t...
The REAL Forbidden Door!
The most unexpected inter-promotional match of 2024! Kapeeka vs. Check Shimatani SGW | April 10, 2024 Rating: ENJOYAB:E I am obsessed with Softground Wrestling. Is it real? Is it fake? Is it actually ...
mondoinvasorx.wordpress.com
That's a great story, but I tried to find the name of the judge , and it seems unlikely the story is true. Unless you have a name of the judge or at least the county, I suspect it's a fairy tale.
Under Jewish law, a judge who condemns a guilty defendant to death is required to fast for a whole day. Imagine if judges still did this.
Surely it should be a rule that if one is to be a person who is responsible for setting laws they should also be familiar with the basic principles of law, such as “innocent until proven guilty” and not “guilty until proven innocent”.
Just stunning that the corruption on the court is so widely known that an open attempt to bribe a judge is greeted with ... I wonder if it's enough to tempt the corrupt judge who takes bribes?
Is the judge wearing a t-shirt with your face on it? Or, a Serious Trouble mug on the bench?
So, like, is it a huge problem that a judge has some bias for the defendant? No.
Is it a huge problem that a judge seems to be seeking to tank the case for the prosecution in an unreviewable manner? That’s the part that worries me.
Corruption of the highest order. It is in the interest of the American people to know whether or not Trump is guilty of the many crimes with which he has been charged before they cast a ballot in November. SCOTUS has robbed us of that chance & we stand the risk of electing a FILTHY TRAITOR as POTUS.
Me, for @takebackthect.bsky.social, on how today's delay of the Trump prosecution is just the latest example of the Court giving Republicans a political win regardless of what their ultimate ruling is.
takebackthecourt.substack.com/p/the-suprem...
The Supreme Court just handed Trump a win
Even if the Court ultimately rules against Trump, by delaying his prosecution they've already helped him avoid accountability
takebackthecourt.substack.com
the idea that a serial inciter of violence and the elimination of the "other" is a candidate for POTUS is not a serious position.
Fear is involved the same way you a guilty man would fear a just system of law
We are the guilty party, and God is the righteous judge.
Arizona is one of the few states without a standalone hate crime charge for a case like this.
At most, if someone is found guilty of a crime such as murder and it's motivated by hate, prosecutors can ask a judge to impose a harsher punishment at sentencing. But it's up to the judge to decide. (8/8)
State Hate Crimes Statutes
State laws against hate crimes vary widely, resulting in unequal protection from similar violent crimes in different jurisdictions.
www.brennancenter.org
Maat
Maat is associated with the judgment of the deceased and whether a person has done what is right in their life. Thus, to do Maat was to act in a manner unreproachable or inculpable.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maat
Is there a term for people who have issues due to both of their parents. Is that a thing
I can judge him for failing to disclose enormous conflicts of interest, with multiple opportunities to correct the omission, and infer that he did so as a result of a guilty mind. I don't have to convict him of a felony to believe there is sufficient evidence he is corrupt.