Just this coyote, you know?
He/Him/Good Boy.
Old enough (to be your dad…)
Are you gonna eat that?
(🔞 if you have the explicit filter off.)
Ah the porn bots are back?
Could be worse. Last time it was CP.
Oh yeah that’s a bit higher than the usual dose. Two Aleve is 400mg, recommended max daily is 600mg.
Naproxen Sodium? Aleve?
That’s the only thing that works for me too.
And judges are supposed to be apolitical.
So if this is how politicians are going to be, we need to ensure the judges are not like this, and focus more on recalling bad judges.
If they’re biased, they’re probably dirty too. It’s all a matter of digging up that dirt.
All the way to SCOTUS.
The legal definition of viable is “can survive outside the womb”
At least that is the definition of viable for states that only ban abortion at the point of viability.
Which is pointless, as no “third-trimester” abortions are ever done by doctors unless the fetus is nonviable.
Yeah it’s quartz/computerized then. It just has an analog face. That’s really cool.
I’ll say it again, I have no illusions that it’s a bad bill. All abortion bans are.
But I also have hard time believing many doctors make any kind of effort to utilize these exceptions even within the letter of the law, because they typically care so little about women in the first place.
Is the movement digital? I see it has pitches too, I guess it can generate clicks and tones?
I don’t see that warning. Just adult content. And others have gotten it on manually labeled nudity/porn, no blood or gore.
AI being AI I guess.
Yes, yes it will. I can’t mute anything without having unclearable notifications, until I visit the web app.
Thread mutes are apparently not server side. The client gets notifications but doesn’t show them. They don’t carry over to the website so it shows and clears them.
It seems to be a bug. You manually marked that as NSFW, right? Their AI labeling appears to be hitting on stuff despite it already being set as adult content.
Like I said, I’d like to see it. Biden should have put Trump in the same category as Bin Laden and sent SEAL Team Six to Mar a Lago a long time ago. Would have quickly taken the wind out of Paxton, DeSantis, Abbott, etc.
But if we’re going to place blame, place it on everyone involved. Even doctors
I don’t expect the politicians to do the right thing. I’m well aware what their intentions are. I’d hope judges would hold to the letter of the law, and failing that, the federal government to step in.
After all, if Trump can threaten to use the military via the Insurrection Act, why can’t Biden?
Confirmed that’s it. Count was 3, and would go away when I visited the tab but kept coming back. I unmuted the thread, they appeared and were cleared. But if I re-mute the thread and there are more replies, will it happen again?
BlueSky just updated to fix notifications not clearing reliably after viewing the tab.
Except now I’m getting a new notification counts and there’s nothing new in the tab. I think they’re on threads I have muted.
Good jorb, devs.
The Texas law is terrible. Florida is also bad, but not AS bad as far as these things go.
Florida’s law has been in place since 2022 and plenty of exceptions have been made without legal issue because it does have consideration for viability, which is why I’m particularly pissed at these doctors.
Prohibitively complicated? This is the relevant clause:
(c) The fetus has not achieved viability under s. 390.01112 and two physicians certify in writing that, in reasonable medical judgment, the fetus has a fatal fetal abnormality.
No kidneys is pretty damn fatal. This case, at least, was clear.
The Texas case is awful. A lower court decided she did qualify, like many others have, but then Paxton personally targeted her. I’m still not clear on what grounds the TXSC overturned the lower ruling.
By all means blame them for restricting abortion in the first place but this law is not hard to understand. I posted a link to the actual statue. It clearly states termination would have been legal.
These doctors were simply wrong, and should probably face malpractice or investigation for it.
Read the law yourself. All it takes is two physicians certifying the fetus is not viable. It does not require a judge.
Healthcare is often a nightmare for women because of doctors not caring or listening. Fix the laws but don’t make excuses for ignorance by the medical profession.
The post was about forcing women to carry a nonviable fetus, and that is what her doctors did because of their ignorance of the actual law, YOU FUCKING MORON.
Texas has a stricter law with no exception for nonviablity, only a risk to the mother’s life.
By all means, work to overturn abortion bans, but place the blame where it belongs when doctors misinterpret the law.
Her doctors were flat out wrong, and they forced her to carry. An abortion would not have been illegal.
Florida’s 15 week ban is bad but it does include exceptions for nonviability and for maternal health, both of which were the case here: www.pbs.org/newshour/nat...
Has to be a bug then. Only warning on the post for me is “Adult Content” which you already set.
Yet your tail is so long you have to hold it in your mouth so you don’t trip over it.
Which one was model #584?
XL Flared Chance in radioactive green?
It’s highlighting the default subject of the image the results below it are based on. I just got the same effect.
I remember getting mine a week before most people. It wasn’t a JP import, the store I preordered it from broke the release date.
And then I quickly discovered it did not work with the RGB cable I made for the SNES. Sigh. Back to composite.
On FB i am following a pair of sphinx cats named Testeclese and Princess Vagina.
Their vet visits are… interesting… for the desk staff.
I believe the API enforces blocks in that you can’t fetch content from someone who has blocked you. There is never a restriction on posting, even if it references a blocked/restricted/deleted post. That makes sense. The question is if BlueSky is smart enough to not put it in everyone else’s view.
In fact, I can reply as many times as I want after being blocked. Only when I reload the page or try to view the thread does the API return a 400.
So that’s an issue. Blocks are not being checked by the API on post, only on get. But the reply is there!
Will their future public API view show it?
Testing from Safari, I had my main account and my alt up in a private windows. Created a test post on main and loaded it on my alt. Blocked my alt from main and replied to the post as my alt, only then did it reload and say blocked post. When I unblocked my alt the reply was there.
BlueSky isn’t even accomplishing a technical solution.
Restricting replies to skeets? Yeah, that’s all client side. If you use an old client or hit the API, you can reply.
It may even be possible to reply to users who have blocked you, and everybody but that user will see it.
From the album, Blu Wav, available February 16th, 2024 on Dangerbird Records. Pre-order + pre-save Blu Wav: https://ffm.to/bluwav Follow Grandaddy: Instagram...
youtu.be
If they don’t implement the same restrictions on the API side, that means you really can reply to restricted posts.
Does that mean you can also reply to users who have you blocked, assuming you find a way to view their posts? Will those replies show up to everyone but the blocker?
Don’t like that.