Katou Nayu
@katounayu.bsky.social
she/her, 30, Intersex, 🚨 CSA Survivor 🚨, lolicon & shotacon(👈 problems → block), not from the US
Daughter: Tenkawa Nayuta
Minors (not Littles) / Zoos / Pedos DNI
The lists I've just deemed to be as wacky as Pokemon badges.
I have 32 Bluesky region badges. 🥴
clearsky.app
You find out all about blocks and moderation lists on your account and others'.
Yeah I just act on the bad faith part, showcasing why it's a bad faith thing.
I feel like they add these on purpose to stir the pot and make sure people doubt themselves, which eventually creates harm, not reduces it.
Those Drives are awesome for just about everything there's to know about things.
I recommend reading all the things.
I have them blocked, so they can't see the post. It's just a PSA-like post I guess..
I have two whole Google Drive folders about it, which were compiled over the years.
Check the folder "Fiction as a Coping Mechanism" here.
drive.google.com/drive/folder...
And here, "Art/Writing Therapy Studies"
drive.google.com/drive/folder...
While your inquiry is a good thing to ask about, about if there're any mislabeled people in Moe Moderation, you blew any civility or respect to that drivel at the end.
Now they're just not accepting me and others who use loli in art therapy and writing therapy.
How would you feel about it if someone else said that the very thing that helps you not become unstable is a lie?
The link to ageplay is precisely how ageplay brings in the concept of innocence, cuteness, and childlike mannerisms in a way that's legal and consenting, because now you're dealing with the real world and humans, so rights and law have to be respected.
No. Loli is a character's body type geared towards cuteness & innocence.
What you depict with these characters can be just about anything, even non-sexual. Consent isn't necessary because it's a drawing, age doesn't matter because it's a drawing. Drawings have no human rights.
Sorry this is restarting two day old discourse but general ageplay kink and loli are radically different things??? One involves adults able to actively consent *and* is often (though not exclusively) nonsexual in practice. The other involves depicting literal children/toddlers in sexual situations
Something something unpierceable shield meets unyielding sword something. :P
Masamune as its name, since Aegis is a mythical shield; name it after a mythical sword.
> 'loli enthusiast' has the same number of syllables as 'certified pedophile'.
And "teenage mutant ninja turtles" has the same number of syllables as "equine gastric ulcer syndrome".
🤡
If I see a n0-limit account, or that only follows those, interact with stuff I post or try to follow me, I will report and block you.
Honestly I just show them how it can be done, but then I feel empty. It feels too unnatural.
I recommend you to block me if you're still too emotionally invested in being antiloli or the content triggers you.
Go ahead. I won't be sad, or bite you.
I'm just genuinely not wanting to do anything harmful to anyone.
Doing it I realized that you have no arguments to make so you're grasping at straws to try to make it visible that your virtue signaling had worked
What happened to let people enjoy things?
Why do you feel compelled to voice your opinion unprompted?
Why do you feel compelled to do criticism always?
Good morning, bloomfies~ ✴️
Waking up and then seeing yet another argument about loli art...
Made an art analysis on the Uzawa Reisa art. Feeling how unnatural it must be to always be doing it for everything.
Bonus:
See? There is a way to do art analysis on loli art. You're just disingenuously saying that people don't or can't do it.
It's almost unnecessary to do this again and again because the focus of the art is to transmit feelings of cuteness and moe, not caring about objectivity at all.
Art Analysis (4/4)
What one can derive from appreciating the art, is a very thorough almost like anatomical study of Uzawa's tummy.
This is an example of how lolicon want to transmit the character's innocence, as a more mature character wouldn't be so carefree with how they present themselves.
Art Analysis (3/?)
The work employs a harsh yellow background, to make sure the subject matter pops, despite said subject being drawn with soft lines and colors.
There's an intent to fill the canvas with the subject matter in various angles, reminiscent of anatomy studies.
Art Analysis (2/?)
The art seems to depict a young-looking female character in various angles, with a focus on its tummy (this is obviously a reference to the original art where the character model has the tummy always exposed)
Art Analysis (1/?)
- Subject matter is a young-looking female character with a halo that's comprised of two stars.
- The artist is someone from the internet, physically probable to be from Japan.
- Made for lolicon, by lolicon.
- Digital art, seems to be sized for sharing online.
A bit of Uzawa Reisa tummy to brighten the day. She's our superstar!
I think they believe in "porn addiction" in general. As if you can't put it down and move on.
It does look like that. "The drawing has the MKUTLTRA that'll make people into pedos, oh no" type of sensationalism.
Like, people, there's systems in place so civilization operates properly, nobody will do stuff they already weren't planning on doing, viewing digital media or not doesn't matter.
That's the thing, they don't. They think a drawing will make or hypnotize (I don't even know how to rationalize it) someone to drop all personal or educated morals, to drop all ethics, then do stuff unconsensually ignoring law.
It's just nuts.
It may not look like it via text, but I mask a lot when I'm defending myself.
In the midst of defending, I was shaking a lot. Grasping what strength I could to stay here and rational enough to keep defending instead of dissociating and shut-downing.
Even if you don't mean it, even if you feel righteous in saying stuff, even if you feel it's the correct thing to say.
You don't know me.
You never cared to ask about me. If I'm feeling fine. If I need help. Who am I.
Instead, you painted me into a monster without noticing. You flared my trauma.
You can call it "CP", say it's of children, etc. in your head.
Don't voice it.
You're re-traumatizing people like me who know very well the difference between this innocent art and *that*, and as bonus, saying CSA can be reduced to fiction.
Hot Allostatic Loads burn much more when you're just wanting to not let the thing that helps you be demonized by ignorant people.
You are in no position to criticize what helps people. It's weird, horrifying, etc? Keep it to yourself, please.
Pedojacketing = Not OK.
1. Lolicon are cuteness schediaphiles.
2. Pedophilia is a paraphilia, you are born with it.
3. Pedophilia is binary: you either have it or not.
4. I AM in therapy and it involves loli, YOU'RE the one destabilizing.
5. There's no "One True Way therapy."
6. Paraphilias are disorders, not illnesses.
Once again, Dr. Seto's words ring true.
"No amount of digital media is going to force someone's hand if their hand wasn't already moving in that direction."
A bit of Uzawa Reisa tummy to brighten the day. She's our superstar!
"if loli people aren’t child rapists, then how come nobody has ever come up with a 800-year-old shota before?"
So, the prompt is finding a non-underage shota (as if that matters)?
Meet Chilchuck Tims, a 29-year old shota Half-ling from Dungeon Meshi.
Like, wanna see the type of loli art I see 99% of the time?
The 1% is loli art that's NSFW and seen under watchful eyes of a therapist and psychiatrist.
It's equal to this.
How is this promoting/normalizing/etc pedophilia?
I just want to feel safe being all of me, I didn't choose to be a schediaphile.
I don't want to be labelled as a pedophile thank you very much. It hurts me. You want me to hide myself. You want me to suffer in silence. That's what you want, more CSA _victims_ not survivors.
Today I'm just having a moment of huge irritation by seeing posts full of Hot Allostatic Load.
If I was a pedo
I'd go after kids
And abuse them
Thankful I'm not
(Sung to Happy Birthday To You cadence)