Rebecca Watson — (secret billionaire meeting)...

(secret billionaire meeting)

WALGREENS CEO: ok so the vote passes, whenever we fuck up we blame shoplifters and minimum wage increases, right?

LOWES CEO: yep

TARGET CEO: got it

RED LOBSTER CEO (in the corner shoveling shrimp into mouth): mmhmm

They probably been banking on people like me.

I just can't eat shrimp. If you dared me to eat 10 shrimp and you'll pay my rent, I'd end up homeless.

They feel so weird in your mouth and the taste is just non-fish enough to be gross.

Super Saiga

Probably online!

Back in like 2006, we found a mortgage co legal outsourcer posted minutes of quarterly meetings with local lawyers for several years...including the one directing the locals to do things that might violate ethics rules. They were there for a long time... Who'd notice, amiright?

Ra Cha Cha

Boeing, their soon to depart CEO is going to get a $45 million bonus/golden parachute for driving the company to produce a product 2x as fatal as the Ford Pinto

America, what a country where inept white men fail upwards and receive massive bonuses for their absurdly huge failures

Rebecca Watson

You are not wrong. Sowell's actual (unsupported) claim, BTW, is that when he was an intern at Labor Dept (summer 1960) "About one-third of their budget at that time came from administering the wages and hours laws." This is all the laws concerning wages and hours, overtime, etc. not just min wage.

Rebecca Watson

I assume he meant 1/3 of the budget was directed to administrating rather than what he said. At any rate, it was an completely unsupported statement and also not just conerning minimum wage.

Even for that claim, over the last 8 years, the budget for the wages & hours division has been around $250 million, which is less than 2% of the $13 billion DOL budget. Today isn't 1960, but what Sowell said is at best irrelevant to today's DOL, and may well be simply false.

I recommend reading Sowell. Back long, long ago, in my teenage years when I was somewhat more open-minded, reading his articles convinced me far better than anything else could that right-wing economics and morality are a con. And somehow right-wing punditry has only gotten worse since then.

Rebecca Watson

I mean he wouldn't be perjuring himself since he's not under oath giving such an interview so there's literally zero consequences to him just making shit up.
Especially considering how little fact-checking/confirming things is done.

Nicholas K. Ricchiuti

Are you familiar with the necessary and proper clause?

I mean are you truly so dense to think the drafters were short-sighted enough to think things would never change or need to adapt?

Even when they put in such obvious "need to be flexible" language.

Nicholas K. Ricchiuti

Similar Posts